On 4/11/07, Stephen Bain stephen.bain@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/11/07, Oleg Alexandrov mathbot@hemlock.knams.wikimedia.org wrote:
However, it is also true that the vast majority of vandalism is committed by anons, and it takes a tremendous energy to police the more than 1.7 milions articles for vandalism.
Most of the *obvious* vandalism is done by IP editors, yes.
But:
- nearly 26% of vandalism reversion is also done by IP editors, [1]
- vandalism accounts for only 3% of edits (plus or minus 1.7%). [1]
I fear the problem looks much bigger to those people who watch Recentchanges all day.
It also can't be forgotten that the idea that Wikipedia is the encyclopaedia anyone can edit is a fundamental philosophical touchstone of the project, and that's why it's one of the [[m:foundation issues]].
-- [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Vandalism_studies/Study1
-- Stephen Bain stephen.bain@gmail.com
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
Stephen makes some important observations but what I'm worried about is that recognizing vandalism from registered accounts is a lot harder. We don't have vandal tools that filter out anon edits for nothing.
Mgm