On 4/3/06, zero 0000 nought_0000@yahoo.com wrote:
Sorry if someone posted this already, but I didn't see it.
Don't think so. Thanks!
publication more than the other. And of the 123 purported errors in question, Britannica takes issue with fewer than half.
This is very interesting - I had completely missed this when I read the Britannica response. I thought they rejected almost everything.
Steve