Charles Podles (charles.podles@gmail.com) [050129 01:39]:
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 00:01:43 +1100, David Gerard fun@thingy.apana.org.au wrote:
(Though that raises the question: what does a stub need *first*: references or more text? Both, obviously, but pick one.)
References. A stub with references is simply easier to expand than one without: a difficult part of the research necessary to a good article (i.e. finding good sources) is already taken care of.
Excellent point. Though a stub with {{unrefenced}} *and* {{stub}} looks a little overwhemled and may not have the desired effect, i.e. suggesting someone fix it.
- d.