On 5/13/07, Ron Ritzman ritzman@gmail.com wrote:
Putting aside the issue on whether the article under discussion should stay or go but isn't the above what Wikitravel is for?
I thoroughly reject the notion that if project A is a good place for some information, then project B must be the wrong place. There is a massive amount of overlap between wikitravel and wikipedia, which is a real pity. Every perfect wikitravel article on a city would be pretty much 70% the corresponding wikipedia article with a bit of information on specific bars, hotels etc.
The goal I work towards is making Wikipedia the best, most comprehensive encyclopaedia ever, by far. Whatever one could say about wikitravel is basically irrelevant to that goal.
Steve