On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 16:56:30 +0000, charles.r.matthews@ntlworld.com wrote:
Nominations under G1, G11, A1 and A7 all can be problematic. Careless use of terms "nonsense", "promotion", "no context", "non-notable" should be deprecated. These are not synonyms with "hard to read", "informative", "obscure topic", "out-of-the-way or annoying to me" (respectively). Basically we need to formulate something that isolates a bit better where things fall down the cracks in the system.
Right. So how to achieve that?
We have two classes of immediately deletable crap: attacks and copyright violations (i.e. stuff that is actively harmful) and just plain junk. Spam is in the latter category.
Attacks should go in the fast track, without doubt.
Self-evident autobiographies should be userfied per [[WP:BITE]]. Corporate vanity probably needs more attention, since they rarely go away.
What would a new process look like?
Guy (JzG)