Jesse W wrote:
On May 29, 2006, at 9:37 AM, Raphael Wegmann wrote:
Yes, Wikipedia publishes anti-Semitic cartoons as well, but they are published on the article about "anti-Semitism" resp. "new anti-Semitism". I wouldn't complain about publishing the J-P cartoons on the Islamophobia article.
Wait a sec. We are talking about putting the cartoons in an article *on the J-P cartoons*, right? AFAIK, no-one is suggesting the cartoons be included in the [[Islam]] article, or even [[2005 Islamic events]] (if we have such an article). So, you think it's utterly wrong to include the cartoons in an article * devoted solely to them *, but it would be fine to include them in an article on a general subject of which they are an (arguable) example? Does this make any sense to anyone else?
The article is called "Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy" and should report about the *controversy* surrounding the cartoons. How are we supposed to write a neutral report on this controversy, if we block the editors who feel insulted by the cartoons?