Jimmy Wales:
Erik Moeller wrote:
As some have pointed out, this is a choice between credentialism and open community processes.
This totally mischaracterizes what this is about. It's a choice between voting and reasoned discourse.
Well, if this is your definition of "reasoned discourse", then you may be right. This is exactly the kind of "reasoned discourse" that I would expect if content disputes are handled on a regular basis by the ArbCom.
"You're wrong. Go away."
I am absolutely against a simplistic voting model without discussion and fallback options and you know it.
Erik