READ. THANKS.
DANIEL RAY DANIELRAY@REDIFFMAIL.COM 27/06/05 MON
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 JAY JG wrote :
In articles which concern the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, don't most edits consist of POV editors from both sides repeatedly reverting each other? ;-)
Jay.
From: Fred Bauder fredbaud@ctelco.net
That's true, but in at least one area, articles which concern the Israeli-Palestine conflict, it is not unlikely that one editor may be repeatedly reverted by a group of POV editors. Perhaps other instances exist.
Fred
On Jun 25, 2005, at 10:17 PM, JAY JG wrote:
From: Jack Lynch jack.i.lynch@gmail.com
I think we need better answers. I am familar w cases like this, and where they end up. How about its a large POV lobby instead of a single user, and they are trying to POV an ancient and contentious topic, chasing off any and all NPOV users who come along?
Jack (Sam Spade)
Um, isn't that what every single POV editor claims when a large number of other editors reject his POV edits?
Jay.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l