And if my good intentions aren't
obvious to you after 1 1/2 years of intense editing, I don't see what
magic
you expect in the coming months.
During those 1 1/2 years you were edit warring. No one is doubtimg your good intentions anyway. What we doubt is your ability to not edit war.
You'll note I was replying to Sam Korn, who did refer to such doubts. In fact, every arbitrator seems to be telling something different, and treating it like an absolute, self-evident truth.
Since you *could* do it then why don't you just do it? What it would
prove is that you *can* edit uncontroversially. I would love to be proved wrong on this.
Huh? Any idiot can make a thousand uncontroversial copyedits. What would you be wrong about in that case?
VV