I appear to no longer be on moderation, so perhaps this thread served a useful purpose, and the list has been reviewed and cleaned up.
I have to say that I did feel discouraged from participating here after receiving mod notices. But if the moderators will make a good faith effort to keep the list maintained properly, so that only those who need moderation are moderated, then I will maintain good faith in their ability to do so.
crockspot
On 9/3/07, crock spot crockspot@gmail.com wrote:
On-wiki block logs are publicly available, so I don't see a huge moral dilemma with a disclosure of the moderation list.
If I was on moderation (which I think I am), I would like to know that, and why.
When I send a contribution to the list, I always get a copy of it from the list, but my contributions don't usually show up in the threads or in the archived discussions.
If I am on moderation, I'm not sure that I should be.
Crockspot
On 9/3/07, Thomas Dalton < thomas.dalton@gmail.com> wrote:
On 02/09/07, Armed Blowfish < diodontida.armata@googlemail.com> wrote:
Lost where?
Wikipaedia blocks and bans people. The goal of Community Exile, in theory, is to convince someone to exercise his or her Right to Leave.
We are not usemod. We don't do everything according to the usemod philosophy. We don't have a principle of "Community Exile", we have "blocks" and "bans". You are neither blocked, nor banned.
Moderators: I'm sure you're reading this, since it's a thread about moderation. I believe Armed Blowfish is on moderation, so could you please stop letting her emails through when she's talking about being banned? It's getting a little tiresome...
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l