David Alexander Russell wrote:
If pictured by themselves, clearly part of a ball bearing, if pictured with a child then the point is moot - can you honestly see a situation where a child posing with 1-inch diameter metal balls is relevant to a Wikipedia article (unless, say, it's in a lolicon article in which case the image would obviously be sexual)
Yes. He's using it as a shooter in a marbles game. An object like that is an all-purpose one that could have many uses. Jumping to the conclusion that it would be used sexually is unwarranted. This is a bit like countries who would ban the export of life-giving medicines to another out of fear that those medicines might be turned into biochemical warfare agents.
Ec