Brock Weller wrote:
Thats not even related to this thread. You've lost the trivia debate months ago, get over it, you're dragging it into unrelated threads now. Bit immature, dont you think? Now, this topic is new and unrelated. Try to stay on topic.
Your declaration of victory sounds as if it should have been pronounced from the deck of an aircraft carrier.
Ec
On 9/10/07, Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
Brock Weller wrote:
'as to ruin someones reputation'? You severely over estimate how coordinated we are as a community. For god sake, we cant settle on anything, you think we can come to a decision on this and keep it secret? As for protecting this particular asshole its far from that. He's dangerous, it seems they were simply protecting previous victims from retribution. I really feel they arbcom should be thanked for taking care of this with so little mess.
I never heard of Bagley until this thread started. Now I read comments from someone, who has also proven the unreliability of his judgement on something as trivial as trivia, libeling a living person by calling him an asshole and dangerous, and expecting us to trust these comments.
I believe that even those accused of the most heinous crimes have a right to a defence, and even if they would not want to appear here personally there need to be standards in the way that we deal with such claims.
If there is not any sort of cabal or conspiracy, why bring it up? Why make up these vicious stories pretending that others are seeing them? What you seem to forget is that wikis are about communities getting together to find a mutually acceptable position; it's not about a handful of people who decide what is good for others, or how others should be protected. For many of us that is what was wrong with the old way of doing things.
Ec