Agreed, this is taking copyright paranoia too far. There is no creative content in this list, it's just a list of books put out by this publisher.
On 3/16/06, Kirill Lokshin kirill.lokshin@gmail.com wrote:
It may be utterly useless garbage, but how is it a copyvio? I was under the impression that non-creative lists of facts (of which I think this is an example) weren't eligible for copyright.