On 24 Mar 2006, at 12:30, Steve Bennett wrote:
We dont accept "with permission" images, and we dont accept anything that is not verifiable by someone else. So there would be supporting documentation somewhere for that case.
Could every editor be obliged to attempt to find that supporting documentation for every image in every article they edit? I really doubt it.
For everything other than self-created pictures, yes. If the uploader cant produce documentation, delete the image.
So for example this blatent copyvio
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:2012legacymap.jpg
Randomly claimed as PD and promo needs a detailed justification (of course there isnt one as it is simply a lie).
Justinc