On Feb 1, 2008, at 7:08 PM, Steven Walling wrote:
Why? It is something we must do. I guess the difference is that people like you think it's just "not a bad idea" and a necessary evil. I think it improves the encyclopedia. Seeing crap stubs that have sat uncited and untouched for years go down the tube is a relief. I don't have to worry about some newspaperman latching on to them or little billy getting an F over them.
Deleting our way to encyclopedic coverage still seems like fucking for chastity to me.
-Phil