On 19/04/06, Katefan0 katefan0wiki@gmail.com wrote:
Everybody who's an administrator knows -- or ought to know -- that any of Danny's actions could be undertaken on behalf of the foundation. To me, this suggests -- in fact, demands -- a lot more caution with undoing his admin actions than otherwise, and at the very least warrants a discreet "what's this about?" before taking action.
There is something very problematic about: - creating a special user account to use for "official business" - creating a special template to use for "unreversible legal-issue official business" - (deliberately?) not using either when in fact legal-issue official business is exactly what's being done
Sort of like how there's a convention of waving a white flag to surrender, and in the middle of a warzone, someone leaves the white flag on the ground and comes out holding a gun. The very fact of flouting the convention speaks loudly...
Disclaimer: I obviously know nothing of the specifics of this case, nor do I know Erik or Danny. But on the basis of what has been presented here, Katefan0's comments do not follow logically from the stated sequence of events.
Steve