On 4/11/06, Neil Harris neil@tonal.clara.co.uk wrote:
Each of these WP "competitors" is run by an organization with a multi-billion-dollar annual turnover.
I'm sure that the current engineering team could achieve similar levels of reliability, given access to an IT budget similar to those available to these companies.
I'm not sure if you were agreeing with me or disagreeing with me. My point was simply that WP reliability is "very good", and if you consider their budget, "outstanding". It is not, quite obviously, as reliable as other top 20 websites, for the simple fact that they have money to burn that we could only dream of.
Steve