Ray Saintonge wrote:
Your statement that "the other ideas are normally all wrong" is a POV. If your criticism depends on a POV then it too is a POV. A scientific experiment that shows something to be wrong is not the same as one that fails to show it right. To say that something which is not science is necessarily pseudoscience is a textbook application of the fallacy of [[False dilemma]].
I never made such an assertion (that all non-science is pseudoscience). I said that pseudoscience is often wrong. So could you give me an example of a pseudoscience which is actually 'right'?
Assuming that you are within the bounds of NPOV calls for a leap of faith. You might as well ask us to believe in intelligent design with you as the designer.
That's a bit hyperbolic, isn't it?
Chris