On 26/10/06, niht-hræfn nihthraefn@gmail.com wrote:
When this has come up before, the idea of mandatory edit summaries has been mostly rejected on the grounds that it'd encourage useless summaries ("adsfdjhsf" etc). However, only certain types of edits requiring edit summaries might be useful, as for removing large blocks of text.
Or indeed reversions.
Edit summaries of "asdfhjshf" vs "remove crap" might weed out the blankers from the miffed.
And the usual remedies for bad behavior could be applied.