Jeff Raymond wrote:
The problem is BLP being used as a bludgeon to get rid of well-sourced, verifiable, NPOV information because the neutral point of view is negative.
How can the neutral point of view be negative? That's a contradiction in terms. An article may contain negative information, but the presentation must still be neutral. The notion that if only negative information is available, this excuses making the "neutral" point of view negative, is at the root of many of these problems. It seems that very few of our contributors have the skill and judgment needed to translate highly unfavorable source material into neutral prose.
--Michael Snow