That is even potentially helpful--if a COI person responds that way, it's a good sign that the article may be very dubious indeed. If I remove the detailed product list as advertising, with an explanation that with it in, the article looks like advertising and is likely to be deleted, and the editor immediately puts it back, that does tend to show the purpose of the article, and I am much more likely to say G11.
On 7/15/07, K P kpbotany@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
(I've found that if there is a COI involved offering to improve the
article backfires seriously--no one with a COI can see their own crap.)
KP
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l