On Dec 22, 2007 1:57 PM, Ken Arromdee arromdee@rahul.net wrote:
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, Bryan Derksen wrote:
I think it would be best to establish once and for all that, _by itself_, "non-notability" is not a particularly good reason to delete anything.
These weren't deletes, they were merges.
Perhaps we should recognize that merges can be de-facto deletes and start treating them as such.
Merges *cannot* be de-facto deletes very easily. There's a significant question as to whether these can be done without violating the GFDL.