--- Cool Hand Luke failure.to.communicate@gmail.com wrote:
Even in cases where the petitioner is ultimately cleared, arbitration requires an arduous defense. For people that would rather, say, work on wikipedia, arbitration is a hassle. No sane individual would want to draw fire from a troll who wants nothing more than to launch spurious attacks.
Noted. I think this is a side effect of the ArbCom not capping the amount of evidence that can be presented (several evidence pages have exceeded 100KB). I'd like to cap the number of words each person in arbitration can submit. This should reduce tit for tat evidence submission that consumes so much time of the people who are in cases (and the arbitrators that have to read all that). I'll put some thought into this.
-- mav
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com