This seems an interesting question. User:Hugh Minnoch wrote an article that has just been deleted:-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Floor_Two%2C_Ma...
You will see that he thought it all a bit of fun and I tried to put him straight. I put this on his talk page:-
"Welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you come to appreciate what it is all about. You might think that your article on a floor of one Hall at Exeter University is a bit of fun, but it really just messes up a good project. I fought to keep really good separate articles on the Halls at Exeter, although I have no connection with the place. They were merged into a single article. Halls of Residence are important and should be in wikipedia. Your bit of fun really does not help. Try to help the project. You might find it is worthwhile. --Bduke 12:46, 21 April 2006 (UTC)"
Seems civil enough to me. He blanked his talk pages within minutes.
He then put the contents of the deleted page on his user page.
Last night I noticed that he had added two barnstars to his user page that claim they have been presented to him by me, although using my full name which is on my user page and not my username. I added this to his user paqe:-
"You break the most important rule on Wikipedia - Don't be a dick. --Bduke 12:01, 24 April 2006 (UTC)"
which is perhaps less civil. He responded by:-
"Brian my love grows for you with each encounter. Just tell me you'll be mine!"
and added many more barnstars to his user page, again largely claiming to come from me.
Now clearly Huck is a dick, but do either the barnstars or saving a deleted article on his user page count as vandalism? It is clearly an attack on me as if people see I have awarded barnstars to this dickhead, they will likely think I am a dickhead.
I intend to leave him alone from now on, but I wondered what people think about this and whether any admin feels anything should be done about Hugh.
Cheers, Brian [[User:Bduke]]