It's also pretty clear that the majority of articles can't exist with some form of protection. Most of them were vandalized when they were left unprotected.
Mgm
On 4/6/07, Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
On Fri, 6 Apr 2007 12:38:04 -0500, Erica fangaili@gmail.com wrote:
Take the information for what you will. I am not sure I accomplished anything other than reasserting what we already know. But it was an interesting experiment.
Yes, it was interesting. It's reinforced my view that timed protection is a good idea, in that we will effectively do this same study serially for new protected articles, and it shows that semiprotection is a very useful tool in helping to maintain a balance between editability and usefulness. Thank you for doing this, and doing the work monitoring the articles, and sharing the results.
Guy (JzG)
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l