Reviewing the text of one of the BJAODN pages Jeffrey O Gustafson deleted and then wheel-warred to protect his action ([[Wikipedia:All Your Bad Joke And Other Deleted Nonsense Are Belong To Ushttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:All_Your_Bad_Joke_And_Other_Deleted_Nonsense_Are_Belong_To_Us&action=edit]], it's clear that JOG's unilateral action is unsupportable. He claims massive copyright violation, but the earliest entry to the page was Navigium Flammae, whose history exists in the database.
If Jeffrey O Gustafson's intentions were pure, he would have done the work to make the pages compliant with *his interpretation* of the GFDL by merging edit histories.
Instead he deleted the page out of process. And since deletion with the claim of copyright violation are protected from content review (c.f. [[Wikipedia:Deletion review]]: "Note that only uncontroversial content should be restored — not revisions deleted as copyright violation, potentially libellous content or similar") his actions can't be easily reversed, even temporarily, so that the general community may take action, instead of the small group of admins.