If you believe the article should be undeleted, then argue the case on Votes for Undeletion. Otherwise you're just joining the recent cadre of inclusionists who are prepared to violate consensus when it goes against them.
-- ambi
Ambi, I *did* argue the case on VfU. The VfU process, *in my opinion*, failed because it failed to discuss whether the admin weighing up the original decision made a mistake or not. It became a rehash of the VfD debate, which is not the purpose of VfU.
Again, my central point is not addressed by any of the replies:
1) Notability is subjective.
2) It is possible that VfD voters have a collective bias in their subjective reading of notability.
3) Borderline candidates about some subjects (Asian manufacturing companies) get deleted whereas others (ogres that appear for one line in one book published years ago, but turned into a geek-popular film) get kept.
We are not creating a neutral encyclopedia without addressing this issue.
Pete