Deathphoenix wrote:
Geoffrey Burling wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Seth Ilys wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 05:02:33 -0800 (PST), Daniel Mayer maveric149@yahoo.com wrote:
Again, I have not seen a single example of a respected encyclopedia doing this. Give me one example and I'll stop complaining.
There are several examples of this in [[nihilartikel]].
Sheesh, if there is so much resistence over [[European toilet paper]], how about if we were to nominate a real topic, like [[Wankers Corner, Oregon]] for Friday's FAC?
Unless none of you trust my word that it actually exists?
Or perhaps [[exploding whale]]. There are plenty of articles we could use. The problem is, with an article like that posted on April Fool's, we run the risk of people actually believing that the article is a fake, when in fact, it's not.
Sounds like some kind of reverse April Fools. Something perfectly true that nobody in his right mind would believe. I like that idea.
Ec