On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 03:35:35 +0100, Andries Krugers Dagneaux andrieskd@chello.nl wrote:
[[User:Pjacobi]] and I [[user:Andries]] agree that we need guidelines about what Pjacobi calls "POV forks".
I think the important difference is that a "controversy" article is a vertical split, but a POV fork attempts to compete with an existing article horizontally. Controversy articles move lengthy details out of the main article, but POV forks present alternate versions of the subject. In my mind, that's the main difference. Duplication of coverage is the reason we shouldn't allow POV fork articles.
Rhobite