--- Richard Grevers lists@dramatic.co.nz wrote:
Hmm ... who here believes that suppressing
anatomical photographs of
genitals is in fact in the "public good"? I guess
LittleDan -- who else?
I don't - although if their inclusion results in W being banned from schools etc then it becomes debatable as to whether inclusion is in Wikipedia's best interests.
That's exactly what I mean. Just imagine if AOL's filters decided to block wikipedia? Wouldn't it be in the "public good" to not have wikipedia blocked? I know what you're going to say: "So we should listen to the filters?" I'm going to be a realist: Yes.
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com