libertarian wrote:
I think administrators' role is exaggerated by Libertarian.
Not true. I've been frustrated at the behavior of the admins. In one edit-war, I was naive to assume that mediation meant that they would look into the merits of the case. Instead, I was accused of McCarthyism by ignorant Americans who refused to believe that there is a Communist Party in India.
The Communist who was posting propaganda had his way on Wikipedia though he was wriing fiction. I was clearly superior and he was inferior which is proved by the fact that he learnt stuff from the discussion page. He was such a fool that he did not know that a candidate who ran for President of India on the Marxist ticket was a Communist Party member. He kept introducing the word 'alleged' which is idiotic.
I believe we've been through this before, and your position has been thoroughly refuted. You have essentially tried to claim any assertions that there was violence against Muslims by Hindus is "communist propaganda", due to the fact that at least one person made such allegations was, several decades ago, a candidate for president on a Marxist ticket. You then tried to rewrite the article with a hardline Hindu nationalist take on the events, one that would not be accepted by any newspaper, barring some of the radical ones in India. You were not "clearly superior"---your writing was inaccurate, and you are simply trying to spew hardline nationalist propaganda on Wikipedia. Your attacks on your opponents for being "communists" or "communist supporters" are becoming rather tiresome.
-Mark