Jimmy Wales wrote:
Timwi wrote:
He already said that. He wanted to re-read the block page. That is a perfectly legitimate thing to want. Also, by the GFDL, users *must* be able to retrieve the source code of a page.
I have no comment about the rest of this thread, but I wanted to point out that this is not true. What is required by the GFDL is *not* that people be able to retrieve the source, but that they are able to get a "Transparent" copy.
Fine, but that clearly doesn't make it an illegitimate thing to want access to the source text, especially as it's available to tech-savvy people (via Special:Export or ?action=raw).
Timwi