On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 20:24:10 -0500, "Daniel R. Tobias" dan@tobias.name wrote:
But that's an error that's highly encouraged by the current prevailing mindset regarding banned users, where ensuring that "banned is banned" and no appearance of a loophole must ever be given takes precedence over the quality of the encyclopedia.
That is policy and has been for a long time.
How do you suggest we implement the policy of being "a little bit banned" without leaving the doors wide open for rampant abuse?
Guy (JzG)