On Oct 12, 2007, at 12:28 PM, Anthony wrote:
Right, COI editing, POV pushing, sockpuppetry, it's all fine as long as it doesn't annoy certain people.
That's precisely the problem being pointed out by so many of the so called attack sites.
Anthony, you're smarter than this. The message and the mechanism of its delivery are, in this case, separate. Yes, valid objections can be raised to things that happen on Wikipedia. No, revealing people's names, calling their employers, and conspiring to have them thrown out of school is not a valid way of raising those objections. No, I (and most other reasonable people) are not inclined to take anything Brandt says seriously, since he's so utterly discredited himself as a pernicious fuckwit.
You are smart enough to know this, and so I can only assume you've returned to needlessly trolling the list. In which case, I feel obliged to point out the moderation queue in which your messages can cheerily reside.
-Phil