On 4/5/06, Daniel Mayer maveric149@yahoo.com wrote:
Britannica's products with Wikipedia. Not to mention that the reviewers were blind to the source of what they were reading and thus there was little to no opportunity for bias on that level.
I seem to recally from the original report a quote saying the reviewers, in practice, did know which one they were reading, because the styles were so different. Am I misremembering?
Steve