To this, I'd like to add a following point:
- This process should not rely on Jimbo. That's for
the simple reason eventually he won't be involved as closely with Wikipedia, & may be replaced by someone who is not as ``hands-off" or ``wise" or ``lazy" as Jimbo has been, & starts to push her/his own POV onto all of us.
Geoff
I agree that we shouldn't be too dependant on Jimbo because, eventually, wikipedia will grow to big and/or Jimbo will die and he won't be able to run it anymore, but I don't see anything wrong with his current leadership. I don't see why we need a leader that tries to push their POV on everything; that's kinda undemocratic. If Jimbo ever is unfit to lead wikipedia for some reason, I think the leadership will turn over to the developers because we won't be able to get a consensus on who to be the leader, but I also think that this would be the best outcome. In any event, we can't kick Jimbo out of power because he owns the servers. LDan
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com