David Gerard wrote:
Blair P. Houghton wrote:
No, I didn't violate the 3RR. I read it right before I made the second reversion. I knew what I was doing. After a couple of reversions, I acquiesced to changes others wanted in the edit. The following revert was to that revision of the edit. The 3RR kept me from refusing to move on the issue. That I was then accused of "evading" the 3RR is just another of GeorgeStepanek's prevarications. That you're buying into it is a shame.
Reverting to different previous versions is reverting.
I'm not going to argue the point of the rule with you. If you wish to continue being a willing dupe of those who wish to railroad honest people, then just keep on sullying your robes.
--Blair