Vicki Rosenzweig wrote:
Sounds good to me--as anonymous56789 he's been a good, steady contributor, and I don't think age is relevant: the project and the work we do on it are what matter.
I agree. I join Ed Poor, though, in _recommending_ that a more confidence-inspiring username would be a good idea. It need not be a real name, of course, but 'anonymous56789' might tend to confuse people, as it sounds like a username of a passerby testing the system, rather than a trusted and valued member of the community.
--Jimbo