On 5/5/05, David Gerard fun@thingy.apana.org.au wrote:
Actually famous Usenet crank. More coherent than Sollog. Lots of material on skeptictank.com .
I think the point here is that WP policy states that we must used only reputable or credible published sources as secondary sources, and Usenet doesn't count as that. It can be used as primary-source material for information about itself, but it can't be used as a secondary source of information about someone else, especially not when we're using a person's real name (unlike the case of Sollog).
Sarah