The sweep it under the rug defence? No, that will not do.
On 11/25/06, James Hare messedrocker@gmail.com wrote:
Separate mailing lists for women? What perfenander.
Guys, we're not going to be improving an encyclopedia/news site/dictionary/quote database/species directory/education wiki/series of textbooks/media repository/primary source library if we keep bickering.
Jimmy-Jimmy said it best: kick out the bad people.
Then get back to work.
On 11/25/06, Jim Schuler jim62sch@gmail.com wrote:
I find it sad that someone feels the need to have a separate mailing
list
for women. Gender bias is an issue that touches all of us and should be discussed openly by *all of us. *As KC noted, separate but equal is a farce: it is merely separate, not equal, for in the act of separation power is ceded to the majority, a majority that is often boorish and smug in
its
ignorance.
It is also sad that when some of the men here spoke out in defence of women, they were attacked for piling on (the offender had slinked off without
so
much as an apology) or are admonished to assume good faith (in the face
of
overwhelming evidence indicating that so doing would be akin to
swallowing
cyanide because a con man told you it was safe). That several of us
noted
the gender bias and spoke out is a clear indication that a problem
exists
here, and needs to be remedied. Alas, I do not think that that remedy
is
to merely boot out the offenders, rather we should confront them with
reason.
Obviously, the possibility of changing any one's opinion is slim as
gender
bias, like racial, ethnic or religious bias, is deeply ingrained within the psyche of the offender, and is endemic to our society (both in the real world and at Wikipedia). However, it is certainly worth our every
effort
to do what we can to break down the the wall of ignorance that isolates and protects the bigoted and biased.
On 11/25/06, Puppy puppy@killerchihuahua.com wrote:
Jimmy Wales wrote:
Puppy wrote:
I appreciate that, Fred. I am not concerned so much about the lack
of
response to my concerns, as I am about the lack of response to
overt
sexist attacks on this mailing list. I am well aware it is not Wikipedia. Most of the people on this list are the same people as
on
Wikipedia. If you call a black man a nigger in the field, you will
at
least /think/ he's a nigger in the house. And don't think the
attitude
doesn't bleed through, because it does.
Can someone send me a link to the archive where these attacks took
place?
--Jimbo
If you are speaking about the incident with a lack of response, which concerned me, it happened on this thread.
When I started posting to this thread, I was taking exception to the categorization of [[Blowdryer]] as a "woman's topic". I tossed out a
few
observations on gender bias. Until I did, I didn't think gender bias
on
WP was that bad - but my inbox is proving me wrong. I just received another email, responding to a post I made to this thread:
<pasted email> On 11/25/06, Puppy wrote: > > When I first started contributing to this thread I received a
number
of
emails, all from women, all thanking me and encouraging me, yet
none
of
them posted to the list.
Private email response:
That doesn't surprise me at all.
Do you think it would be a good idea to have a separate mailing list to discuss the problems of gender bias in Wikipedia (both in terms
of
the content and the community)? Along the lines of [[LinuxChix]] perhaps?
<end pasted email>
Why didn't this woman, like the others who have been emailing me, post to this list? I am getting emails from women, all saying how terrific
I
am, how glad they are someone is posting these concerns, and now I'm getting suggestions for a women's mailing list. Why do you think that
is?
Alphax wrote "Women arguing on this list reinforces the view of "woman-as-empty-headed-shallow-person"."
This is clearly an overt sexist attack. Let's put the shoe on the
other
foot - what if most of the posts to this list were by men, and a woman wrote "Men arguing on this list reinforces the view of "man-as-stupid-testosterone-driven-lout"? But that isn't really a parallel, because women don't run this society. Try imagining this - lets change "women and men" to "black and white", using gender issues rather than race issues from the r/w: You are a black man. You live in
a
society where most of the power is wielded by whites. All the bosses you've ever had have been white. The president has always been white. There are people who express openly their beliefs that blacks are substandard. Your religion states you are subservient to whites, and that is God's plan. Until the 1970s, you did not have autonomy over
your
body, under the law. Until the 1980s, you could not even own property
in
some states in your name - your white boss owned it, and in fact could do what he wanted with it under the law (See Kirchberg v. Feenstra, 1981). You can be raped by a white person, and if you take it to
court,
it is often worse than the rape - people make racist remarks, say you "asked for it." You walk into a room. Almost everyone is white.
Someone
makes a racist comment. None of the other people protest, and some laugh. Do you A) Speak out your convictions strongly and clearly? or
B)
give a weak laugh and look for the exit door?
I'm thinking the other women are waiting to see if I'm lynched. That's why they are emailing me privately, even suggesting a separate mailing list. *They are intimidated against posting these concerns on this list.* I personally don't think that "separate but equal" works very well. I'm speaking up, myself.
What if the black man had seen a different response? What if someone made a racist comment or joke, and /all/ the white people in the room had spoken out, telling the bigot they didn't tolerate such behavior? Told the bigot to apologize, to take his racist comments elsewhere because they were not welcome? I think the black man would breathe a little easier... but he'd still be outnumbered. I hear about a "welcoming attitude" and "we should be on the lookout for bias or
other
bad behavior towards women editors and do what we can to mitigate its effects" yet how many spoke out when Alphax posted his clearly anti-female post to this list? I'm saying we are in a biased society, which is reflected in both mens' and womens' attitudes, and if you
truly
want to get a more balanced editing pool and make women feel welcome here, no gender bias, whether subtle or overt, can be ignored. Or
we'll
continue to have a few strong women, fewer as we go up the chain of power, and the imbalance will continue.
-kc-
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
-- Jim http://iacobomus.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l