slimvirgin@gmail.com wrote:
You twice reversed the indefinite block of a highly abusive troll who spent a lot of his time on WP attacking me (someone I know emailed lots of people looking for someone to unblock him, including you, in my opinion). When I objected to your wheel warring, you made personal
I must insist you retract that allegation. It has no basis in reality and is nothing more than a disingenuous personal attack. If you have ANY, and I mean ANY evidence at all, you'll provide it. I am utterly disgusted by that comment.
attacks against me on another talk page I was editing, and reverted to them several times when I tried to remove them. You called my post
They were not personal attacks, and your editing of my comments was an inappropriate action for you to take.
about admin concerns "whining"; you called me a liar on your talk
This is quite a justified word to use. I'll cite some passages from the email in question:
"Almost every block is at serious risk now of being reversed by an admin who's never read the blocking policy, has had very little interaction with the community, and who got elected with under 20 votes"
"leading to yet another unknown and possibly clueless admin being promoted"
"Combine poor admins with hundreds of users who are turning Wikipedia into a social club, and you have a giant mess"
Your comments in the previous email seemed to be directed at me, and for that record, I was elected with 30 support votes, I have been an admin since July - having made two proposals on adminship reform previously to it, taking quite a lot of flak in the meantime - I am quite well known, I read the blocking policy every time I make a block just to ensure I am acting within policy, I contribute to the article namespace, and I single-handedly got an article to featured list status only recently.
page; you deleted another admin's warning to you about it; you turned
I later retracted that phrase and the other person's warning about it, since it was no longer relevant.
up on my user page deleting two images half an hour after first asking me about them; and then, apparently astonished that I would dare to
I apologised for removing the images; I was probably not the right person to do so, but I did so only after you had replied saying my actions were not supported by policy (which they are) and disregarded my second comment completely).
revert you, you reported me on [[WP:AN/I]]. Then you went to WP:Fair use, and changed the tag from guideline to policy, in order to support your report; and you're currently bickering with another admin who has
The ArbCom recently declared that the fair use policy is indeed policy, and I was surprised to see that there was not a policy tag on it. Kelly Martin, an arbitrator, later added a policy tag on the appropriate section I quoted to you requesting you remove them.
tried to reason with you about it. (As for the images, I've deleted
I'm bickering with no one.
one, and I'm trying to find out about the second, which used to carry a free-licence tag, and that would have happened without your bullying.)
I'm glad to see that, but there was no bullying.
If you think your behavior is appropriate -- an example of the kind of civility you were earlier advocating -- the situation's even worse than I thought. What it looks like is that you're continuing where Marsden left off, and I very much hope it's just that it looks that way. At least Marsden didn't have admin privileges, though the way things are going, he's likely got a sockpuppet fighting vandalism as we speak in preparation for his nomination.
Again, I have no relationship with Marsden, a fact I have repeatedly told you. I reject any such allegation, and I think you should retract it unless you have any evidence. Which you don't, because I don't have any connection with him whatsoever.
Chris