It's a fair request. If new admins get auto-checked, existing admins that never were should be auto-checked. Why would they care? After all, they're all admins rigorously following policy. Correct? Therefore, this just shows the community their willingness to apply policy equally to all editors. Unless, of course, that's just hypocrisy and policy gets applied more equally to some editors.
So there's no confusion or topic changing attempts, I fully support the no proxy policy. I'm simply stating that those who have not been checked deserve to have the rules applied consistently to them.
--- "NSLE (Wikipedia)" nsle.wikipedia@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure where you're going with this. This is the third time (at least) I've seen you ask this. I've seen no evidence that either of them are using or have used proxies. There is no reason for you to be targetting them specifically, unless you know something all of us else don't.
On 17/06/07, Joe Szilagyi szilagyi@gmail.com wrote:
- Will both of you agree to immediate CheckUsering,
reviewed by multiple other checkusers/Foundation staff, and if you are found to be using proxies, this is disclosed on-Wiki? Yes or no. If no, why not?
~~Pro-Lick http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/User:Halliburton_Shill http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pro-Lick http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pro-Lick http://www.wikiality.com/User:Pro-Lick (Wikia supported site since 2006)
--spam may follow--
____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545433