On 11/27/07, Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
Kirill Lokshin wrote:
It *is* actionable. People have been desysopped for conspiring with banned users.
You might correct that by saying "banned users not named 'Daniel Brandt'".
Bullshit! Such an action merely gives greater weight to the content of an article than to the person who wrote it. Just as we don't accept that editors should have ownership over an article, so too should we not be granting ownership to the banned user. By undeleting the article the particular admin accepts responsibility for the contents of the article irrespective of who originally wrote it.
Excellent points again. Of course, the only alternatives to undeleting the article would be: 1. to re-create it entirely from scratch (i.e. such that one's new version is not derived from any previous one) lest one run afoul of the GFDL by failing to properly attribute the previous author(s) for their work. 2. not to have an article at all, ever. In the majority of cases, this is not an appropriate solution to consider.
—C.W.