On Fri, 15 Jul 2005, Fred Bauder wrote:
If the problems William M. Connoley presents were temporary, I would not have objected to Administrator status for him. He believes a Wikipedia article should prominently feature the "truth." While this sounds ok on its face, in practice any method of arriving at the truth though reference to expert editors such as himself presents prospects of sustained conflict. Our references need to be to reputable published information.
FB has an odd definition of NPOV. The rest of the arbcomm don't agree with it:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Climate_chan...
-W.
William M Connolley | wmc@bas.ac.uk | http://www.antarctica.ac.uk/met/wmc/ Climate Modeller, British Antarctic Survey | (01223) 221479 If I haven't seen further, it's because giants were standing on my shoulders