on 6/19/07 9:17 PM, Gracenotes at wikigracenotes@gmail.com wrote:
I am aware that my paragraph is somewhat out of context, and is more meant as a general response to the so-called "culture" for which you've recently been advocating. But it's a piece of satire (so, like A Modest Proposal, it naturally employs hyperbole), and I hope to heaven that you realize that. Or else I shall get a wall to bang my head against. (Figuratively.) It's meant to intellectually stoke things up, to get people to *think* about things; I have talked to some editors who have indicated that they sense the atmosphere in some parts of Wikipedia discourages original thinking about extra-content situations. Now, if you can identify why I think this culture is a bad idea, congratulations, you're off to a super start! (Or you can claim to be confused.)
Cheers, Gracenotes
Gracenotes,
I liked what you wrote, and knew from which perspective you were writing. I had no problem figuring out the angle or true meaning of your message. I encourage you to keep writing; letting your instincts, values, and personal ethics guide you. In short: I like your style!
Whereas, I agree somewhat with Ray's belief in a need for caution when writing; I would like to offer another perspective on the use of such caution in communication: Too much of it, or a preoccupation with it, can lead to no communication at all except dishonest, deceptive, politically-correct mush.
Satire is tricky to write, just ask the "Saturday Night Live" or "The Daily Show" writers; its purpose is to poke fun at something or someone, as well as to call attention to a social and/or political issue; to preach to the choir (that's how you get them to sing) as well as to those not yet converted. But one thing for sure - you're going to piss someone off in the process. And, if that happens, to write honestly, that needs to be OK with you.
Know your intent. If that intent is to teach - expect what you are teaching to be challenged. If that intent is to inflame - expect a conflagration. If that intent is to do harm expect to be called to account for it. If that intent is to communicate your truth expect their truth in return. The burden of truth and understanding in any form of communication must be shared equally between the two parties. If I liked what you said, I'll tell you; if I didn't I'll do the same.
If we are to have a creative, free-thinking, reasonably intelligent, articulate culture within Wikipedia, can we ask or expect anything less?
Marc Riddell