On 6/14/07, Bryan Derksen bryan.derksen@shaw.ca wrote:
Tony Sidaway wrote:
I'm hopeful. Once we've seen the back of that article, I'll begin to consider that Wikipedia has come of age.
Seems more like giving up on the Wikipedia process entirely. What else will we decide we "can't be trusted" to write articles about next? And will that decision be made in the same haphazard back-channel way this one is being made in?
It was an open discussion followed by almost certainly the most comprehensively documented close we have ever seen. You can see the comments the closer made as he considered each point. The result is on deletion review but seems to be holding up very well indeed.