RoboGeo: the sources include two articles that are not written by its creators. One of those is even a book. I don't like how there's little content there and how it has a big "download here" sign, but I'd give it a chance due to the fact it has independant sources.
The software guidelines probably need to be stricter and more specific so for example random flash games without a lot of visitors and/or a widespead cult status are excluded.
Mgm
On 1/14/07, Anthony wikilegal@inbox.org wrote:
On 1/14/07, Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
On Sun, 14 Jan 2007 08:34:54 -0500, Anthony wikilegal@inbox.org wrote:
Are software programs potential candidates for speedy deletion under CSD A7? The criterion states that potential candidates are a "real person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content", which doesn't explicitly include software programs.
Depends if you're Wikilawyering or not. A blatantly non-notable SourceForge project may well be speedied under A7 (or G11) rather than waste everybody's time with a longer process.
What makes a software program "blatantly non-notable"? The one I have in mind is not a SourceForge project. To give an example, what about [[RoboGEO]]?
What must an article about a software program do to "assert the importance or significance of its subject"?
See [[WP:SOFTWARE]]
Are you saying you agree with that proposed guideline? It doesn't seem like many software programs fall under it. If I pick a random software program from download.com, should it probably be in, or probably be out?
Anthony
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l