Jeff Raymond wrote:
Because a verifiable stub isn't worth it?
I did not say that. The point is, it is NOT verifiable. It is likely a copyvio, and the amount of information known about this woman from reliable third party sources is about as close to zero as you can get.
It was written by someone who appears to have a serious problem with respect to uploading copyvio images and claiming he took them. I see no reason to trust anything about the article at all.
In the meantime, we have an article that is most likely a copyvio, and in any event contains a number of totally unverifiable sources. And any movement to do something about this sort of nonsense is met with the view that people are out to censor pop culture or something like that.
--Jimbo