On 16/09/06, Phil Sandifer Snowspinner@gmail.com wrote:
No reason why anyone with half a brain needs to look at the exact parameters of what is and isn't a personal attack.
IIRC (I haven't looked lately) the article is a list of weaselings people have attempted to use claiming their attacks weren't attacks. If someone has decided "let's refactor this to conclusively solve the philosophical problem of how much of one person's upset is another's wrongdoing," they may have missed the point.
- d.