On Nov 27, 2007 3:11 PM, James Farrar james.farrar@gmail.com wrote:
On 27/11/2007, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/27/07, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com wrote:
On Nov 27, 2007 1:56 PM, Risker risker.wp@gmail.com wrote:
The fact that ANY administrator believed that a pre-emptive block of a possible sockpuppet was acceptable behaviour is the problem. It is a systemic issue and there is absolutely no reason to believe that Durova
is
the only administrator who thought that way; in fact, there seem to be administrators posting in this thread who feel that such actions are perfectly acceptable.
Name them please.
On Nov 27, 2007 2:30 PM, Risker risker.wp@gmail.com wrote: Well, jayjg, let's put you in this situation. You have elected for your own [long hypothetical story snipped]
Risker
Risker, I asked you to name the admins who "believed that a pre-emptive block of a possible sockpuppet was acceptable behaviour." Name them please.
The point is that it's impossible to name them because their identity is being kept a secret; they have been referred to only as "trusted people".
No, Risker stated "there seem to be administrators posting in this thread who feel that such actions are perfectly acceptable." Posting in this thread, not elsewhere. Risker must know who he meant when he said that.